Click here for the list of unorthodox Yeshivas marching
"We (homosexuals) are in every Yeshiva." -- a sign the homosexuals carried at the 2012 Israeli day parade.
 |
| The sign reads "We are in every Yeshiva" |
By Avi Goldstein
I write the following with a very heavy heart. I
am a life-long Zionist. I believe that the State of Israel is part of the
process of redemption. Along with many readers, I cry when misfortune befalls
the Jewish State, and I rejoice when hearing good tidings. Indeed, these words
are being written the day before Yom HaAtzmaut, when I will join untold numbers of Jews in joyously reciting Hallel. Yet
I find myself in the uncomfortable but necessary position of calling upon
fellow supporters of Israel to refrain from attending the upcoming Celebrate
Israel Parade.
For almost nine months, I have been involved in
trying to resolve a critical matter regarding the parade (formerly the Salute
to Israel Parade). This annual event is a centerpiece of support for Israel in
New York. One television station covers the parade from start to finish. The
parade is a moment for supporters of Israel to put their best foot forward, to
showcase the broad support that Israel enjoys.
Last year, however, a radical change took place
that compromised the moral integrity of the parade. Jewish Queer Youth, a group
of mostly Orthodox gay men and women, was permitted to march under its own
banner. This alone would have been bad enough, but the group used its platform
to glorify homosexuality and to declare that homosexual conduct is normal. One
particularly offensive banner stated: “We are in every yeshiva.”
Upon hearing this, I contacted the Jewish
Community Relations Council of New York, which administers the parade. I
expressed my concern that the parade was endorsing behavior that the Torah
describes as an “abomination.” I noted that it would be no different if a group
called “Shabbat Violators for Israel” or “Adulterers for Israel” were allowed
to march. My plea, to a JCRC staff member, fell on deaf ears (a later email to
JCRC head Michael Miller has gone unanswered as well).
The JCRC staffer insisted that the parade lineup
had been circulated ahead of time to the participating organizations; had they
wanted to protest, they would have done so ex ante. Yet perusing that lineup,
which was available on the JCRC website, it took three attempts for me to find
Jewish Queer Youth, because it was listed simply by the initials JQY! Yes, its
participation was disclosed, but not in a manner discernible to the other
groups. Moreover, JQY was shunted to the back of the parade to minimize the
chance that others would notice its participation. Indeed, my wife left the
parade route a bit before the end of the march, and we found out about JQY’s
attendance only because a friend who stayed later called us, disturbed at what
she saw.
Over the course of several months, I spent
considerable time contacting dozens of principals and rabbeim at yeshivos that
march in the parade. I expressed my belief that it is unacceptable for Orthodox
groups to march in the same parade as a group that glorifies immorality. With a
few exceptions, those to whom I spoke were sympathetic to my concerns. However,
I could not find someone who would step up and, as I desired, author a letter
to the JCRC that would declare unequivocally that yeshivos would not march in
the 2013 parade unless Jewish Queer Youth were excluded.
Nonetheless, some progress was made, and several
weeks ago, JCRC was called to a meeting of leading Jewish educators. I did not
attend the meeting, but someone who was present has told me that with the
exception of one school, the others were willing to tolerate JQY’s
participation in future parades.
I found this news jarring, but I was not entirely
surprised. Approximately two decades ago, a synagogue that caters to a mostly
gay and lesbian clientele attempted to march with provocative language on its
banner. At the time, the yeshivos objected and threatened to boycott the
parade. The parade organizers backed down, and the synagogue was forced to
march under a banner that simply stated its name.
Why, then, was I not surprised that today no one
would step up? What has changed since the earlier confrontation was
successfully resolved? The answer is that in the ensuing two decades, an
unrelenting campaign by gay activists has caused even those within our own camp
to question whether homosexual conduct is immoral. It is said that a lie
repeated often enough becomes the truth. This is precisely what has happened
regarding homosexuality. We have been so worn down by the pro-gay campaign that
we have begun to question our own stance; uncompromising opposition has given
way to moral ambivalence.
Why, however, should we care whether gays openly
march alongside us? In truth, there are many devastating ramifications. Readers
may not know, but the stated goal of gay activists is to make homosexuality
“normal” in law and in practice. Here are some of their goals:
1.
Redefinition of marriage. Already implemented in
New York, gay activists want full recognition of same-sex unions in all spheres
of public life. For example, we can expect that advertising posters, publicly
displayed for us and our children to see, will feature gay couples. We can
expect the same in television, print, and online ads. If you don’t believe
this, consider that one tv show, Modern Family, portrays a gay family as
entirely normal. I have not seen the show, but I have read that this family is
treated as just another nuclear unit; no mention is made of its different
construction.
2.
Gay activists seek to equate their cause with
the cause for black civil rights. In the not too distant future, it may become
a hate crime to publicly speak against homosexuality. In case readers are
unclear, let me rephrase this: If a rabbi, speaking about Jewish law, states
that homosexual conduct is an abomination, he may be subject to a lawsuit or
even to arrest!
3.
Home sellers and renters will not be allowed to
exclude gay couples from buying or renting. You will advertise your second
floor for rent. A gay couple will show up and you will not be allowed to refuse
to rent to them based on their sexual preference. Your children will be exposed
to this unnatural coupling and you will be unable to do anything about it.
4.
Gays have long been on a campaign to teach
children that their lifestyle is just one of many “normal” choices. This is
being taught in schools to children at the youngest ages. And while parochial
schools are not forced to teach this, we should be concerned that public school
youths are exposed to this blatant immorality. And let us not forget that many
Orthodox boys and girls attend public schools.
One of the big lies espoused by gay activists is
that separation of church and state precludes the government from taking a
moral stand against homosexuality. The implication is stunning. If one believes
that the law cannot indicate a preference for heterosexuality, one is saying
that almost every legislator who has served since the founding of our country
until approximately five years ago is a racist. He or she, by refusing to
endorse same-sex marriage, is as guilty of discrimination as were anti-civil
rights legislators. Bill Clinton as President was no better in this regard
than, say, segregation firebrand Stephen A. Douglas.
Separation of church and state prohibits the
government from incorporating a specific religion in law. It does not prohibit
the state from taking moral positions. The state takes moral positions on many
matters and ensconces those positions in law. For example, it is illegal to
kill. The law prohibits murder not only because society could not function if
murder were legal, but because the Judeo-Christian heritage looks upon murder
as morally repugnant. This is readily seen in the fact that when a murder is
particularly egregious, judges will denounce the defendant in very strong terms
and impose an even greater sentence than might otherwise be incurred.
As our law has evolved, the law and the courts
generally have avoided taking positions on matters that do not have consensus
among mainline religious groups. For example, there is no religious consensus
on abortion. The Catholic view, for one, is much more restrictive than the
Jewish view. But when it comes to homosexuality, our shared religious tradition
has been unequivocal in viewing it as an abomination, as stated in the Torah.
It is perfectly reasonable for law to reflect this unambiguous view. And while
no one is suggesting that the government peek into people’s private lives, the
law must not endorse this immoral conduct.
Does it make a difference whether a behavior is
simply tolerated or whether it is given the law’s stamp of approval? The Midrash
(Bereishit Rabbah 26:5) teaches that the fate of the Generation of the Flood
was sealed when it became legal for men to contract marriages with each other!
The behavior was going on, tolerated by G-d, until it was given the imprimatur
of law.
My friends, do we risk becoming another flood
generation, G-d forbid?
The damage is even greater when we consider our
beloved State of Israel. The Torah states that homosexual behavior can lead to
the spitting out of Israel’s inhabitants (VaYikra 18:22-28). If we participate
in a parade that endorses homosexuality, how are we contributing to Israel’s
welfare? The Celebrate Israel Parade, by including Jewish Queer Youth,
transforms from an event that benefits Israel to one that harms it. Dear
readers, are you willing to be a party to such an event?
Well-meaning disputants have countered that
Orthodox groups do march alongside Conservative and Reform groups,
notwithstanding their endorsement of non-halachic practices. This is true, but
it is beside the point. Conservative and Reform temples and organizations do
not state openly on their parade banners that they reject Jewish law. Rav Yosef
Dov Soloveitchik, zt’l, was quoted frequently to the effect that we can and
must cooperate with heterodox groups on matters of communal import. The Rav
wrote that all Jews share a “covenant of fate,” that our destiny is
inextricably intertwined. However, it is unimaginable that he would have
consented to walk in tandem with a group whose whole raison d’etre is to flout
halachah.
I had hoped to carry on this campaign to a
successful conclusion without having to take my case public. However, the
refusal of schools and organizations to challenge the Jewish Community
Relations Council has left me no choice. If the Orthodox public takes a stand,
collectively or individually, we may succeed in changing the composition of the
parade. If we stand by and do nothing, we in effect are stating that the
Torah’s moral code carries no weight.
The Celebrate Israel Parade is scheduled for Sunday,
June 2nd. There is still time for those of you who agree with my message to
protest to your yeshivos, day schools, and organizations that the current
composition of the parade is unacceptable, and that if JQY marches, you will
not march or attend.
I have set up an email address to handle
communications regarding this cause. It is israelintegrity2@gmail.com. I
welcome suggestions on how to bring this matter to a successful conclusion. I
welcome messages of support as well; if you are willing to stay away from the
parade, please tell me. With the blessing of G-d, we will succeed.
Avi Goldstein, the author of The Eternal Heritage
series on Chumash, was involved in Jewish publishing for over 20 years. He
currently works in the automotive industry.
Update: Several rabbis
banned participation in the 2013 Israeli Day Parade.
Update: One year later, parade
almost loses marchers for allowing anti-Israel people to parade.
